Revision of the UN Manual on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-Legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions (the Minnesota Protocol)
Opening of public consultation on draft text
The UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, in collaboration with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), is consulting on a revision to the UN Manual on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions (sometimes referred to as the “Minnesota Protocol”).
The draft of the revised Minnesota Protocol is now open for public comments by States, academia, civil society, and other interested parties during a six-week period from 11 April to 23 May.
The draft text is available here.
All comments should be sent to email@example.com (including “Minnesota Protocol” in the subject).
Background to the Minnesota Protocol
The obligations on states to respect and protect life and the procedural obligation to investigate suspicious deaths have firm bases in international law. In the UN context, those obligations are expounded in two key documents: the UN Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions, and its companion document, the Minnesota Protocol.
The Minnesota Protocol was – and remains – a ground-breaking piece of work with significant impact. However, the time is ripe for revision, to take account of developments in both international law and forensic science. As a key UN text providing guidance on the practical implementation of the duty to protect life and the obligation to investigate potentially unlawful deaths, its updating will ensure its continuing relevance over the coming decades. In a number of resolutions, the UN Commission on Human Rights called for such a revision (also later referenced by its successor, the Human Rights Council).
The revision process
The process of consultation on revision of the Minnesota Protocol was formally launched in April 2015, based on a scoping exercise aimed at establishing the areas of reform required, with the appointment of an Advisory Panel and two Working Groups, the latter tasked with doing the drafting of the new document. The Advisory Panel consists of 73 members representing a wide range of experience and expertise, from all continents. One of the Working Groups focuses on legal investigations; the other on forensics.
Interested parties were invited to make an initial written contribution to the consultation process by 15 June 2015. A first meeting of the two Working Groups was held in Geneva on 30 June to 1 July 2015.
On 29 October 2015, the Special Rapporteur presented his 2015 annual thematic report to the General Assembly in New York (A/70/304) in which he set out the background to the revision of the Minnesota Protocol and discussed the process. During the interactive dialogue several states expressed their support for the revision. For example, on behalf of its members, the European Union noted that the “EU would like to commend the Special Rapporteur for an active engagement to update the 1991 UN Manual on the effective prevention and investigation of extra-legal, arbitrary and summary executions. As underlined by the Special Rapporteur today, the Manual indeed provides important guidelines on how the UN principles on these issues in practice can be implemented in accordance to international law”.
The first public consultation
On the same day the Special Rapporteur convened a side-event on the revision of the Minnesota Protocol for the benefit of states and civil society in the UN headquarters. The Rapporteur and the chairs of the Working Groups provided an update on progress to date and engaged in a dialogue with participants.
The second public consultation
The second meeting of the Working Groups was held in Geneva on 4–6 February 2016. A side-event to which all States and other interested parties are invited was held on 5 February in the Palais de Nations, which attracted representatives from more than 25 states and offered a further opportunity to states to engage in dialogue with the Special Rapporteur and the OHCHR.
The draft of the revised Minnesota Protocol for public consultation
The text that emerged from the February Working Group meeting was circulated for comment by the members of the Advisory Panel. It was subsequently revised on the basis of their suggestions and recommendations with a view to public consultation as described above.
A selection of recently published or other relevant material: