Women and girls on death row require specific gender-based responses and policies
GENEVA (10 October 2018) – Speaking on the
World Day Against the Death Penalty,
UN human rights experts* urge Governments around the world to address the situation of women and girls on death row:
“Women and girls are an invisible death row population whose plight and needs are too often ignored. Today, we call on States to address the multiple violations of human rights and gender-based discrimination faced by women and girls on death row.
Women and girls have not been necessarily understood as a distinct category of death row population. While they have been executed in significantly smaller numbers than men, their invisibility means that their specific needs are largely hidden, along with the specificities of what brought many of them to death row: multiple human rights violations stemming from gender discrimination.
There are at least 500 women currently under sentence of death around the world, although this is likely a conservative estimate as some states refuse to publish information on their use of the death penalty. This represents under five percent of the world’s death row population, but this average hides significant variations between countries where the figure rises to as high as 18 percent.
We are extremely concerned that a significant proportion of women on death row have been affected by gender-based violence, abuse, and trauma. In particular, in the case of girls sentenced to death, most known cases concern the defendant killing an authority figure in the context of child marriage and/or gender-based violence. We further emphasise that the execution of any person for offences committed when they were below 18 years of age is strictly prohibited by international law.
When prosecuting women and girls, courts routinely fail to consider their history as survivors of gender-based violence and other forms of gender-based oppression. In particular, it is exceedingly rare for domestic abuse to be treated as a mitigating factor during capital sentencing proceedings. Even in those countries with discretionary capital sentencing, courts often ignore or discount the significance of gender-based violence.
Under universal standards of due process and fair trial, the imposition of the death penalty is always arbitrary and unlawful when the court ignores or discounts essential facts that may have significantly influenced a capital defendant’s motivations, situation and conduct, including her exposure to domestic violence and other abuse.
Indeed, experience shows that most women and girls on death row come from backgrounds of severe socio-economic deprivation and many are illiterate, which has a devastating impact on their ability to participate in their own defence and to obtain effective legal representation.
In some countries, women have been sentenced to death for drug-related offences. Women are criminalised for drug offences at an extraordinary rate, representing around 30 percent of worldwide arrests for drug trafficking. The majority of women on death row for drug offences are poor and foreign nationals or migrants; most appear to be so-called drug mules, or street sellers. The disproportionate use of the death penalty against them reflects excessively tough criminal policies and violent public discourses in the context of the so-called “war on drugs” which involves severe and widespread violations of human rights, including torture, enforced disappearances and arbitrary deprivations of life.
In many cases, courts judge women not just for their alleged offences, but also for what are perceived to be their moral failings: as “disloyal” wives, “uncaring” mothers, or “ungrateful” daughters. Nowhere are transgressions of the social and cultural norms of gender behaviour punished more severely than in a capital trial. Further, some countries condemn women to death for “crimes of morality” such as adultery, in contradiction to the most serious crimes threshold, which limits application of the death penalty to crimes involving intentional killing. The execution of the death penalty often involves methods amounting to cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment, or even torture, such as executions by stoning. Laws and policies that provide for these penalties moreover encourage family members and vigilante groups to execute women and girls including in the name of so-called “honour”.
Women, including those serving death sentences, are also vulnerable to violence, particularly in prisons where male staff supervise them, or where prison authorities fail to protect them from violence at the hands of other prisoners. They may be shackled, including during pregnancy and labour. They are usually unable to access female-specific healthcare and necessary hygienic products. Women also suffer from isolation from their families because of the social stigma associated with their sentence, and an enduring lack of family contact.
Around the world, death sentences continue to be imposed in violation of major international standards, including the right to a fair trial and the principle of non-discrimination. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights make clear that all people are entitled to the equal protection of the law without discrimination.
The application of death penalty against women who were children at the time of the offence, against women victims of multiple and repeated gender discrimination, including during trial, and against those whose crime fails to meet the required threshold of gravity, are all instances of likely arbitrary killings.
We therefore call on States to review all death sentences against women and girls, and to adopt gender-based responses and policies to address gender violence, biases and discrimination which characterise investigations and trials, and which contribute to bringing women and girls to death row, along with social economic and other causes or factors.
We also call on States to strictly observe the United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders (the
Bangkok Rules); and the revised UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules), which outline specific provisions concerning women, including rules on their separation from male detainees and their supervision by female staff.
The imposition of the death penalty on women and girls remains an under researched issue. We welcome the recent
report by Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide, on this topic and call for more such studies into the gender-specificities of death penalty, including situations where gender intersects with other identities markers such as poverty or race.
We applaud the steadily growing majority of countries, which have completely abolished the death penalty – standing at 106 at the end of 2017. The World Day Against the Death Penalty provides a unique opportunity to recall the importance of further promoting the global trend towards universal abolition of capital punishment.
*Ms. Agnes Callamard, Special Rapporteur on
extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions,
Mr. Ahmed Shaheed, Special Rapporteur on
freedom of religion or belief;
Mr. Dainius Pūras, Special Rapporteur on
the right to physical and mental health; Mr. Diego García-Sayán, Special Rapporteur on
the Independence of Judges and Lawyers; MsDubravka Šimonović, Special Rapporteur on violence against women;
Mr. Felipe González Morales,Special Rapporteur onthe
humanrights of migrants; Ms.Ivana Radačić, Chairperson of the Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice;
Ms. Karima Bennoune,Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights;
Mr. Nils Melzer, Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment;
Mr. Philip Alston,
Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty;
Mr. Seong-Phil Hong, Chair-Rapporteur of the
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention.
The Special Rapporteurs, Independent Experts and Working Groups are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.
For more information and media requests, please contact:
Ms. Rhiannon Painter (+ 41 22 9179143 /
firstname.lastname@example.org) or write to email@example.com
media inquiries related to other UN independent experts please contact:
Mr. Jeremy Laurence, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+41 22 917 9383 /
This year is the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN on 10 December 1948. The Universal Declaration – translated into a world record 500 languages – is rooted in the principle that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” It remains relevant to everyone, every day. In honour of the 70th anniversary of this extraordinarily influential document, and to prevent its vital principles from being eroded, we are urging people everywhere to Stand Up for Human Rights: www.standup4humanrights.org